Challenge Ahead of Cambodia—How Cambodia escape the four traps
Mr. Tang Sihout is the youngest candidate among 10 successful contestants in the Essay Competition organized by the International Oxfam. He wrote an excellent paper about Cambodia and Donation!
He uses Professor
Paul Collier's theory about the four traps that caught the country into falling apart,
these four traps include: conflict trap, natural resources, being landlocked
with bad neighborhood, and bad governance. this is likely happening in Cambodia nowadays.
Challenge Ahead of Cambodia—How Cambodia escapes the four traps
A reading reflection of the book “The
Bottom Billion”
According to Professor
Paul Collier’s book, “The Bottom Billion”, there are four risk factors that
contribute to the failing of states. Professors Paul Collier define these four
risk factors as trap which include Conflict, natural resources, being
landlocked in a bad neighborhood, and lastly having bad governance.
The
Bottom Billion takes the conflict that occurs at a country as one of the traps
that caught it into falling apart. The book also raise the two forms of
conflict, that is civil war and the coup d’état. Low income, slow growth and
primary commodity dependence make a country prone to civil war, whereas low
income and slow growth—two risk factors that exactly the same as civil war,
make a country prone to coups.
The
second trap that caught a country into falling of state is the natural
resources. Professor Paul Collier raise in the book that, discovering of
valuable natural resources in context of poverty might also become a trap that
drag a nation into falling apart. He talked about Dutch Disease in the book and
said that the revenue generated from exporting natural resources might crowd
out the necessary of export other traditional products which include
labor-intensive manufacturing products and services, and hence slowing growth.
The Book also take an example of Niger where it had experience the phenomenon
of Dutch Disease, a term of concept which the apparent relationship between the
increase in exploitation of natural resources and decline in manufacturing
sectors. During the 1980s Niger enjoyed an oil boom which comes along with
heavily borrowing and massively spending on wasteful project saturate with
corruption. However, the country’s development turn to collapse after the world
oil price dropped down. Professor Paul Collier came to conclude that because of
the country’s natural resources that closing off its chance of diversifying
into manufacturing and service export which will potentially lift it out of
poverty, slow growth that contribute to
falling apart.
Beside
the trap of conflict and discovering of abundance natural resources in context
of poverty, the third trap is being landlocked in a bad neighborhood. Professor
Paul Collier argued that geography also matter to a development of a country. A
poor country locate in geographically landlocked region with poor neighbor
surrounding it increase the difficulty of that country in the development path
and is more likely to fall apart. He raised the aspect that being a landlocked
country make it heavily depend on (or were even hostage by) its neighbors to
transport its export manufacturing products which is the most suitable
development pattern at present time. Export will incurred more cost for
landlocked country in order to transport its manufacturing products to its
destination. Moreover, if its costal neighbors have poor transportation
infrastructure, the cost incurred might be higher and that is something beyond
the landlocked country’s control, that’s why Professor Paul Collier said that
the landlocked country are hostage to their neighbor and is a trap that caught
them into falling apart.
The
last trap that drags the country to be a falling state is having bad
governance. In the Book “The Bottom Billion”, Professor Paul Collier said that
the terrible governance and bad policy can destroy an economy with alarming
speed, citing the example of Zimbabwe where president Robert Mugabe ruled for
more than three decades, the economy are deteriorated and inflation rate
culminate to startling 1,000 percent. However, Professor Paul Collier also
emphasized some successful corrupted
poor governance countries like Bangladesh where its economy continue to grow
despite being one of the most corrupted country on the earth. Lastly, he came
to a conclusion that, the minimum governance criterion for poor country is the
government merely has to avoid doing harm if it does not provide effective
governance with clean investment environment.
Among
the four risks factors which include conflict trap, discovering of abundance
natural resources in context of poverty, being landlocked with bad
neighborhood, and bad governance, I think the biggest risk factor that Cambodia
faces is bad governance and discovering of natural resources. As Professor Paul
Collier argued in his book that a country may suffer from having fallen into
one or more of these four traps, Cambodia also inevitably incapable to escape
it at all. After three decades of civil war and internal conflict, Cambodia
regain its uneasy peace at 1993’s general election after mediation of
international community However, this uneasy peace did not really exist until
the completely dissolve of Khmer Rouge residual arm force at 1999. Six years
from 1993 to 1999, post conflict Cambodia tottered on its development path.
Even this country experienced a brief internal fighting in 1997 and a continual
social security’s problem, it luckily successfully prevent itself to relapse
into conflict again which is one of the risk factors that will trap a country
to fall apart.
I
strongly agree with Professor Paul Collier’s propose solution for bottom
billion to escape from conflict trap, especially with the idea that
international aid need to be sustained during the first decade of post
conflict, providing technical aid rather than fund to post conflict nation in
first one to three years, and give aid with string attach which aim for reform.
Citing the experience of Cambodia after general election in 1993, aid started
to flood into Cambodia for reconstruction of the country in various form not
limit in fund, but also in technical support. The evidence to support this
perception is the founding of hundreds and thousands of NGO that actively
operate their activities in various sectors, like health care, education, food
human rights, gender equality, etc.…. These NGO effectively help the country
especially the remote rural area to escape poverty and contribute to the
development of local community. Without the technical support, especially from
NGO, Cambodia would not go as far as today it is today. Entering 21 century,
thank to the stability of political situation, Cambodia undergo rapid economy
growth after flood in foreign investment and international aid, and hence
growth in average income and improve in living standard. From the aspect of
present development and political situation, I do not think there will have any
possibility that this country will relapse into conflict again, therefore, it
is no longer a challenge for Cambodia’s development.
Skipping
the possibility of falling into conflict trap, we have trap of discovering
natural resources. As Cambodia have discovered abundance natural resources in
recent years, the issue of how to manage these resources properly and transform
it to benefit its ordinary people have become an urgent agenda. Indeed, we need
to address this issue properly and carefully in order to get rid of the natural
resources curse that used to happen in many countries, especially countries of
Bottom Billion.
Discovering
natural resources are either an opportunity or a risk. As professor Paul
Collier discussed in the book. Norway became one of the richest countries in
term of average income after discovering of its natural resources. Contrary,
Niger’s natural resources closed off its opportunity in developing its
manufacturing and services export during 1970s. Cambodia’s discovering of its
oil reserve under sea as well as mineral underground can be a turning point for
our country. If we handle and manage these resources properly with efficiency
we will be able to turn these black gold to benefit our people as well as
developing economy. Nevertheless, if we relapsed into the way which other
Bottom Billion countries have used to passed, it will become sources of
corruption, huge revenue generated from this would benefit only ruling elite
and their ally and might potentially widen the gap between rich and poor, or
even trigger social unrest. In order to prevent the discovering of natural
resources which should be a good thing for Cambodian turn to another traps that
fallen our county into a falling state, we must adapt transparency and
accountability in this industry. First of all, the government must be
transparent and open for public in the process of awarding private company the
rights of exploitation. This can be done through conducting public bidding with
appropriate legal procedures. Secondly, the government should take into
consideration over the impact of exploitation to the environment and local
community. Development should not come under the cost of environmental
devastation and pollution. Moreover, the impact to the local community is also
crucially important as local population shall be the biggest beneficiary but
not the victim of natural resources exploitation. Any impact incurred should be
carefully restrict and respect the rights of these people. Furthermore, the
eviction should not become an option as possible, even in case it is
inevitable, it shall be done after carefully study with participation of local
community.
The
third trap that was discussed in the Books of “The Bottom Billion” is being
landlocked with bad neighbor. Fortunately, Cambodia is not a landlocked country
with a 443 km of coastal line, so our country will not face the problem as
argue in the Professor Paul Collier’s Book. Nevertheless, even Cambodia is not
a landlocked country, but our coastal line is relatively short compare to our
neighbors. Most part of our country still surrounded by three other neighboring
countries. The short and limit coastal line are just like a small window open
to the world while the rest vast region remain landlocked. Furthermore,
Cambodia’s economic center as well as the majority of labor-intensive
manufacturing factories is locating at Phnom Penh and its surrounding region
where it has about 300 km away from its only sea port. Transportation cost
might be high if compare to other countries where most of their manufacturing
industry located at coastal region like Vietnam and China. Cambodia economic,
especially export driven manufacturing industry will develop more rapidly if we
have good transportation infrastructure that lower the cost or if we shift this
industry to coastal region.
The
last trap that’s being raised in Professor Paul Collier’s book, and also the
risk that I think are the greatest challenge to Cambodia is the bad governance.
As a post conflict country, Cambodia inevitably faces the challenge of poor and
corrupt governance. The bad governance not only reduces the efficiency and
effectiveness of public services, but also undermines aid that is originally
intent to help our people.
According
to World Bank, it defines the term governance as the manner in which power is
exercised in the management of a country’s economic and social resources for
development. One of the internationally comparable measures of governance and
an example external assessment is the World Governance Indicator. The indicator
include some assessment criteria include indicator of voice and accountability,
political stability and absence of violence, government effectiveness,
regulatory quality, rule of law, control of corruption. Based on these
indicator, Cambodia perform poorly having score only about 0.10 to 0.30 (the
higher the percentage, the better it is). This is a reflection of bad
governance of this country, and this might really matter for the development of
Cambodia.
As
governance involve in every corner of development in a society, the quality of
governance directly determine the quality of development of that society. In
Cambodia, examples of bad governance may go beyond counting. At public school,
students have to spend extra money and taking extra time for special class in
order to get pass in an exam. At public hospital, patients have to pay extra
money in order to get better medical care, while the poor have to line up which
usually take several hours waiting for their turn to meet a doctor and receive
only perfunctory treatment with impolite manner. At government institution,
processing any legal documents like apply a citizen ID card, criminal record
would take longer than a month, etc… the public services in Cambodia truly
reflect and tell you how the governance is here.
If
the minimum requirement for good governance is to do no harm to business as
raised in the book by Professor Paul Collier, then governance here may hardly
qualify for this criterion. According to the World Bank, it takes an average of
22 days to export goods in Cambodia while regional average is 19 days, and at
Asia average, it takes only 16 days. Set up a new business in Cambodia need to
complete 9 procedures which take about 75 days’ time, while the Asia Pacific
has an average procedure of 7 and need to take a much shorter times of only 37
days.
Poor
governance is always the hotbed of corruption as there are no a complete
mechanism and system in monitoring and poor law enforcement. As the result of
corruption, the wealth of the country are on the hand of a few powerful ruling
elite and their ally, and the victim are the bottom people who have no access
to their basic welfare and social securities net protection that they deserve
to have. Hence, gap between rich and poor become widen which is the potential
cause of social unrest.
Professor
Paul Collier’s propose of conditionality aid—aid with string attached that aim
for reform, can work to help Cambodia to improve its governance quality. Good
governance reform has been taken to agenda thank to the donors push. However,
the most powerful impetus of reform toward good governance comes within the
society itself. Everyone in the society bears the responsibility of pushing
their society toward reform, and indeed, it really works. Remember that every
one of us has one vote on hand, without the support of constituency, the
politicians will not have the courageous and commitment to reform, good
governance will never come true.
In
the “Bottom Billion”, Professor Paul Collier proposed several solutions to the
problem that face ahead of them which include aid, military intervention,
establishment of international chapter or law, and lastly pro-poor country
trading policy. As I already mentioned
above, aid really play an important role to help the country of bottom billion
like Cambodia. No matter in any form, aid greatly assists the people living
there. It helps them survive from starvation, illness, and conflict, help their
community to development. The aid with string attached also force the ruler to
adapt reform, even it does not really work but at least, it is taken on the
agenda and people start to talk about it, and Cambodia is the real example that
aid help in reform of good governance. In return for aid, Cambodia government
has to promise to achieve some specific target set by donors. In every 18
months, the donor will meet the Royal Government of Cambodia in Cambodia
Development Coorporation forum, where donor review their aid program and
progress of reform, then set the next development target for government in
exchange of additional aid. Throughout this forum, the donors will be able to
take this opportunity to encourage government for more reforms which could
include land tittling, human rights, corruption, juridical system, etc… It is true that not all reforms are because
of donor’s pressure, but at least it has encouraged and funding the necessary
reform that is critically important for Cambodia.
Military
intervention as a solution should not be a choice of helping the country of
bottom billion, unless there are legitimate and conceivable reason that, if the
international community do not intervene, then there will be a serious
humanitarian crisis in that country. However, military intervention should not
allow to become an excuse of world power using it to intervene the internal
affair and violate of sovereignty of other country. The United Nation’s General
Assembly (not the Securities Council that controlled by its five permanent
member) should be the only authority that have the power to make decision of
whether or not to intervene a particular country. Doing so is just to avoid the
catastrophe that happen over Iraq by US groundless invasion.
I
agree with Professor Paul Collier’s propose creating an international law or
norm as a standard to follow internationally. However, this international
chapter should not created by the European Union as raised in the book, it has
better to be created by the globally institution which have the participation
of all country around the world, and United Nation is the only possible choice.
However, in order to do like this, the United Nation should amend its chapter
which gives the absolute power to its Securities Council’s five permanent
members; otherwise it will become an instrument of power struggle between these
world powers. It must give more authority to its General Assembly which
represent its entire member and where the smaller country can have their voice
heard internationally.
Similar
to the establishment of international of chapter, changing trade policy also
should lay on United Nation rather than the World Trade Organization (WTO).
World trade policies which ran against the Bottom Billion countries can settle
only through political dialogue but not trade negotiation, this is a political
issue rather than trading issue.
What
can youth do to help? Youth bear the responsibility of helping their country
escape from developing traps and poverty. As the future leader of Cambodia,
youth can make their own contribution through their action. First of all, they
should empower themselves with knowledge and professional skill. Only knowledge
and professional skill can help the country. Without these human resources, implementation
of reform and development is impossible. Cambodia cannot depend on external
technical assistant forever. More importantly, where the human resources in
Southeast Asia will be able to move around the region freely without
restriction, Cambodia will face strong competition from our neighboring and
other ASEAN’s members. Knowledge and professional skill will become critically
important.
Secondly,
youth should actively participate in social activities, making their own
contribution as much as possible. The activities they participate can be
charity work, volunteer job, and other community activities, etc… The power of
our individual is not enough, only when youth join together, forming a force,
then they can have influence to change their community or even their country.
Third,
join a political party. Politic really matter a lot, so the only way to matter
the public that eventually matter your own country is joining a political
party. Political party youth group always an important force of a society,
entering it enables you to change your country once you became their leader in
the future. And even you are not going to become a politician, joining
political campaign can also become a precious experience in your life.
Lastly,
go to vote. This is the best and most effective way to change your own country
and have your voice heard. Do not look down upon your vote, you have to
exercise the rights which is still an impossible thing for many people in some
countries. Go to vote to choose a leader you think able to lead you country
toward prosperity.
Professor
Paul Collier’s “The Bottom Billion” point out the traps that caught the bottom
billion country into falling state, and he finds out solution that help these
country escapees from falling apart. Cambodia as a post conflict nation has a
lot of thing that can be learnt from this book. Some causes that rose in the
book echo Cambodia truly experience, some traps can be lesson for Cambodia for
not relapse into it again, and some solution can directly apply to our country.
Finally, as the youth who might potentially become future leaders of the
country, we should actively do everything, taking action and make our own contribution
to our community, our society and our country as much as possible.
Comments